---

The Dancing Plague of 1518: When the City of Strasbourg Couldn’t Stop Moving

In the sultry summer of 1518, the citizens of Strasbourg—then part of the Holy Roman Empire and now in modern-day France—witnessed a scene that would etch itself into the annals of bizarre history. It began with a single woman dancing uncontrollably in the street and ended with dozens of people twitching, jerking, and leaping for days on end, some until their deaths. This surreal outbreak, often dismissed as medieval myth or exaggerated folklore, is in fact supported by contemporary accounts. Known today as the Dancing Plague of 1518, this inexplicable event remains a case study in mass psychogenic illness, societal stress, and human vulnerability.

---

The Woman Who Danced Alone

The episode began in July 1518, when a woman known as Frau Troffea stepped out into the narrow streets of Strasbourg and began to dance. There was no music. Her body moved violently, without rest. She continued for hours, then days. Onlookers gathered in fascination, unsure whether they were witnessing madness, possession, or divine ecstasy. Reports suggest she showed no signs of joy; her face was pained, her movements involuntary.

Within a week, more than 30 people had joined her, similarly afflicted by the compulsion to dance. By the end of the month, that number had risen into the hundreds.

---

The Authorities Intervene – With More Dancing

In most societies, such a phenomenon would have prompted fear and perhaps confinement. But the response of the Strasbourg authorities was both curious and historically revealing. Believing the outbreak to be a natural illness, possibly caused by “hot blood” or an imbalance in bodily humors (in accordance with Galenic medicine), the city council took an unconventional approach: they built a stage and hired musicians.

Their reasoning was simple, if flawed: if these people were dancing due to some inner compulsion, they should be allowed to dance it out. Music would help them complete the ritual. They even opened guildhalls and commandeered public spaces to accommodate the swelling crowd of dancers.

This response, while well-intentioned, backfired dramatically. The addition of drums, pipes, and professional accompaniment only encouraged more people to join, and the dancers’ conditions worsened. Historical sources claim that many collapsed from exhaustion, and some reportedly died from strokes, heart attacks, or sheer physical trauma.

---

What Really Happened?

Despite its folkloric texture, the Dancing Plague of 1518 is no mere legend. Several contemporary chronicles and medical notes from the time confirm the event’s occurrence. The question that remains unanswered is: why did it happen?

Scholars have proposed several hypotheses over the centuries:

1. Ergot Poisoning

One theory posits that the dancers were victims of ergotism, caused by consuming bread contaminated with Claviceps purpurea, a hallucinogenic mold that grows on damp rye. Ergot contains alkaloids similar to LSD and can induce hallucinations, spasms, and psychosis. However, ergotism usually causes convulsions and constricted blood flow, not rhythmic dancing. It also tends to disable rather than mobilize. Moreover, the synchronized nature of the episode and the apparent endurance of the dancers challenge this explanation.

2. Mass Psychogenic Illness (MPI)

The most widely accepted theory today is that of mass psychogenic illness—a psychosomatic phenomenon triggered by extreme stress and shared social belief. Strasbourg in 1518 was fertile ground for such a reaction. The city had been battered by famine, disease (notably smallpox and syphilis), and economic hardship. A wave of apocalyptic fears was also spreading, with many citizens interpreting their suffering as divine punishment.

In such a context, mass hysteria—especially in a deeply religious population—could manifest in dramatic, embodied expressions. Dancing, often associated with saints like St. Vitus, was believed to have curative or purifying powers. People might have unconsciously adopted the behavior as a form of penance, or release.

3. Religious Ecstasy or Possession

In medieval Europe, behaviors that today might be diagnosed as psychological disorders were often interpreted as signs of spiritual possession or divine inspiration. The Catholic worldview of the time supported the idea that sins could physically manifest. Dancing, particularly when involuntary, had historical precedent as a sacred or demonic act.

Interestingly, similar outbreaks had occurred before: in Aachen in 1374, for instance, hundreds of people danced uncontrollably, crying out in pain and hallucinating. These events were often blamed on St. Vitus’ curse, reinforcing a self-perpetuating mythos.

---

Aftermath and Legacy

By late August 1518, the Strasbourg dancers began to recover. The authorities, seeing the failure of their musical intervention, reversed their strategy. They banned public music and dancing, even at weddings. Some of the afflicted were taken to a mountaintop shrine dedicated to St. Vitus, where they were believed to be healed through religious ritual and isolation.

The Dancing Plague gradually faded, but its eerie memory lingered. It was never seen again on the same scale, though smaller outbreaks of “dancing mania” occurred across Europe in earlier centuries. The episode became emblematic of the intersections between belief, health, and societal pressure—a rare moment when psychology erupted into spectacle.

---

Modern Reflections

Today, the Dancing Plague serves as a haunting case study in group psychology. It forces historians, psychologists, and cultural theorists to confront uncomfortable truths about the mind’s susceptibility to collective delusion and the body’s expression of stress. It blurs the lines between religion, medicine, and performance.

In a broader sense, the event speaks to something perennial: the human need for expression in times of crisis. Whether through dance, protest, art, or madness, societies under duress often find strange ways to externalize their suffering. Strasbourg’s dancers may have had no voice—but their bodies told the story.

---