Manila: A City Shaped by Water, Empires, and Memory
Manila is not merely a capital city. It is a palimpsest—layers of time written over one another, never fully erased. To walk its streets is to cross centuries in a single afternoon: precolonial river settlements beneath modern flyovers, Spanish stone churches shadowed by American neoclassical buildings, wartime ruins beside glass towers. Manila’s history is inseparable from water, trade, conquest, resistance, and survival. It is a city born of tides and remade by empires, yet persistently Filipino at its core.
This is the story of Manila not as a frozen monument of the past, but as a living, contested space—one that has been destroyed and rebuilt, colonized and reclaimed, remembered and forgotten. From its early days as a riverine polity called Maynila, through centuries of colonial rule and war, to its uneasy place in the modern global cityscape, Manila’s history is both local and global, intimate and monumental.
I. Before Manila Was Manila: The Precolonial World of Maynila
Long before Spain planted its flag on the shores of Luzon, the area now called Manila was already alive with human activity. Archaeological evidence and early foreign accounts suggest that the Pasig River delta was home to thriving communities as early as the 10th century. These settlements were not primitive or isolated; they were deeply connected to regional trade networks that stretched across Southeast Asia and beyond.
The name Maynila is commonly believed to have come from the phrase “may nilad,” referring to the nilad plant that grew abundantly along the riverbanks. Whether or not this etymology is botanically precise, it reflects a fundamental truth: Manila was shaped by water. The Pasig River connected Laguna de Bay to Manila Bay, forming a natural highway that facilitated commerce, communication, and cultural exchange.
A Trading Polity, Not a Village
Precolonial Manila was not a mere fishing village, as early Spanish chroniclers sometimes implied. It was a polity—a political and economic center ruled by local leaders known as datus or rajahs. By the late 15th century, Maynila was under the rule of Rajah Sulayman, Rajah Matanda, and Lakandula, figures who would later become symbols of early Filipino resistance.
Chinese, Malay, Arab, and possibly Indian traders frequented the area. Porcelain from China, spices from the Moluccas, textiles from India, and gold from Luzon circulated through Manila’s markets. Islam had begun to take root through trade and intermarriage, particularly among the ruling elite, linking Manila culturally and politically to the wider Islamic world of Southeast Asia.
In short, Manila was already global before Europe arrived.
II. 1571: The Spanish Conquest and the Birth of Colonial Manila
The arrival of the Spanish in the mid-16th century marked a profound rupture in Manila’s history. In 1570, Spanish forces led by Martín de Goiti attacked Maynila, burning parts of the settlement. The following year, Miguel López de Legazpi formally established Manila as the capital of the Spanish East Indies on June 24, 1571.
Intramuros: A City Within Walls
The Spanish quickly recognized Manila’s strategic value. Its deep natural harbor, central location, and access to inland trade routes made it an ideal colonial capital. To secure their hold, they built Intramuros, a walled city designed to protect Spanish residents from both foreign invaders and the local population.
Intramuros was not just a defensive structure; it was a physical manifestation of colonial hierarchy. Spaniards and Spaniards born in the colonies (insulares) lived within the walls, while native Filipinos, Chinese migrants, and other non-Europeans were relegated to surrounding districts like Tondo, Binondo, and Santa Cruz.
Stone churches, government buildings, and military barracks rose quickly, reshaping the landscape. Indigenous houses made of wood and nipa were replaced—or forcibly removed—to make way for European urban planning. Manila became a Spanish city imposed on an Asian foundation.
The Galleon Trade: Manila at the Center of the World
For over 250 years, Manila served as one endpoint of the Manila–Acapulco Galleon Trade, one of the most important commercial networks of the early modern world. Once or twice a year, massive galleons crossed the Pacific Ocean, carrying silver from the Americas to Manila and Asian goods—silk, porcelain, spices—back to Mexico and Spain.
This trade transformed Manila into a global entrepôt. It connected China to Europe, the Americas to Asia, and Catholic missionaries to distant lands. Wealth flowed into the city, but it was unevenly distributed. While Spanish elites and merchants profited, most Filipinos were subjected to forced labor (polo y servicio), tribute collection, and land dispossession.
Manila became wealthy, but not free.
III. Faith, Control, and Resistance Under Spanish Rule
Religion was central to Spain’s colonial project, and Manila became the headquarters of Catholic evangelization in Asia. Orders such as the Augustinians, Dominicans, Franciscans, and Jesuits established churches, schools, and hospitals throughout the city.
Education and the Seeds of Consciousness
Ironically, institutions meant to reinforce colonial control also sowed the seeds of resistance. The University of Santo Tomas, founded in 1611, became one of the oldest universities in Asia. While initially intended to educate clergy and colonial administrators, it eventually produced Filipino intellectuals who would question Spanish authority.
Over time, a class of educated Filipinos known as the ilustrados emerged. Though Manila remained racially stratified, ideas from Europe—liberalism, nationalism, secularism—began to circulate among the city’s elite.
Revolts and Repression
Manila witnessed numerous uprisings throughout Spanish rule, from early revolts against tribute and forced labor to later, more organized resistance movements. These revolts were often brutally suppressed, reinforcing the city’s role as a center of colonial power.
The execution of Gomburza—Fathers Mariano Gómez, José Burgos, and Jacinto Zamora—in 1872 sent shockwaves through Manila. Accused of sedition, their deaths radicalized a generation of Filipinos, including José Rizal, whose writings would later ignite the Philippine Revolution.
IV. Manila and the Philippine Revolution
By the late 19th century, Manila had become a hotbed of political ferment. The contradictions of colonial rule—economic exploitation alongside limited education, religious authority alongside Enlightenment ideas—reached a breaking point.
Rizal and the Power of the Pen
José Rizal’s novels, Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, were banned in Manila, yet widely read in secret. They exposed the abuses of friars and officials, using Manila and its institutions as both setting and symbol.
Rizal’s execution in Bagumbayan (now Rizal Park) in 1896 transformed him into a martyr and turned Manila into sacred revolutionary ground.
The Katipunan and the Fall of Spanish Rule
The revolutionary society Katipunan, founded by Andrés Bonifacio, operated largely in Manila and its surrounding areas. Though the revolution spread nationwide, Manila remained its symbolic heart.
In 1898, after more than three centuries of Spanish rule, Spain surrendered Manila—not to Filipino revolutionaries, but to the United States, following a staged “mock battle” designed to exclude Filipinos from the city.
Manila had changed rulers, but not yet its fate.
V. American Manila: Modernity, Segregation, and Control
The American occupation of Manila marked another dramatic transformation. Unlike the Spanish, the Americans framed their rule as a civilizing mission, emphasizing education, public health, and infrastructure.
A New Urban Vision
American planners, including famed architect Daniel Burnham, envisioned Manila as a modern city with wide boulevards, public parks, and government centers. The Luneta area was redesigned, and neoclassical buildings rose around what would become the core of governmental Manila.
Public education expanded rapidly, with English as the medium of instruction. Manila became the showcase of American colonial success in Asia.
Benevolent Assimilation—or Another Empire?
Despite reforms, American rule was still colonial. Filipino resistance was met with military force, and Manila remained under foreign control. Economic structures favored American interests, and political power was limited.
Still, Manila became a center of Filipino political activity. Newspapers, labor unions, and political parties flourished. The city grew rapidly, absorbing migrants from across the archipelago.
VI. War and Ruin: Manila in World War II
Few cities in the world have suffered destruction on the scale Manila endured during World War II. Declared an open city in 1941, Manila was initially spared bombing, but Japanese occupation soon turned brutal.
Occupation and Fear
Under Japanese rule, Manila became a city of shortages, surveillance, and quiet resistance. Civilians suffered immensely, and guerrilla networks operated covertly throughout the city.
The Battle of Manila (1945)
In February 1945, American and Filipino forces launched a campaign to retake Manila. What followed was one of the most devastating urban battles in history. Japanese forces refused to surrender, leading to widespread destruction.
Over 100,000 civilians were killed. Historic Intramuros was reduced to rubble. Churches, schools, and homes were obliterated. Manila, once called the “Pearl of the Orient,” became the second most destroyed city in World War II, after Warsaw.
The trauma of this destruction would haunt Manila for generations.
VII. Postwar Manila: Reconstruction and Rapid Change
After the war, Manila faced the immense task of rebuilding. Independence came in 1946, but the scars of war remained visible.
Rebuilding Without Remembering
Much of Manila’s reconstruction prioritized speed over preservation. Historic buildings were demolished or replaced with utilitarian structures. The focus was on functionality, not memory.
As the capital of the newly independent Philippines, Manila became a magnet for rural migrants. Informal settlements grew rapidly, often near rivers and industrial areas.
A Divided Metropolis
Economic inequality deepened. While business districts expanded, poverty became more visible. Manila’s population density increased dramatically, straining infrastructure and public services.
Yet the city remained vibrant—a center of culture, protest, and creativity.
VIII. Martial Law, People Power, and the Modern City
Manila played a central role in the political upheavals of the late 20th century.
Martial Law and Resistance
Under President Ferdinand Marcos, Manila became both a stage for authoritarian spectacle and a site of resistance. Protesters filled its streets, newspapers operated under censorship, and fear coexisted with defiance.
EDSA and Democratic Renewal
In 1986, millions gathered along Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) to peacefully overthrow the dictatorship. Though technically outside Manila’s city limits, the event reaffirmed Metro Manila’s role as the political heart of the nation.
IX. Manila Today: Memory, Identity, and the Future
Modern Manila is a city of contradictions. It is overcrowded yet intimate, chaotic yet deeply human. Skyscrapers rise where ruins once stood, but traces of the past linger in street names, churches, and oral histories.
Efforts to preserve heritage coexist with relentless development. Intramuros has been partially restored, while other historic neighborhoods struggle to survive.
Manila continues to ask difficult questions:
How does a city remember trauma while moving forward?
How does it balance progress with preservation?
How does it remain Filipino in a globalized world?
Conclusion: Manila as a Living History
Manila is not just a place where history happened—it is history still happening. Its story is not linear, nor is it finished. Every generation rewrites Manila in its own way, adding new layers to an already complex identity.
To understand Manila is to understand the Philippines itself: resilient, wounded, hopeful, and endlessly adaptive. The city has been conquered, burned, rebuilt, and reimagined, yet it endures—not as a museum of the past, but as a living testament to survival.
Manila remembers. And in remembering, it lives.
The Knowledge Base 
Leave a comment