Harare: A City Named After Memory, Power, and Survival
Harare is not merely a capital city; it is a palimpsest. Beneath its roads, buildings, and suburbs lie layers of erased villages, renamed rivers, broken promises, reinventions, and stubborn continuities. To write the history of Harare is to write about conquest and resistance, planning and improvisation, forgetting and remembering. It is a story shaped as much by colonial maps as by footpaths worn into the earth long before those maps existed.
Harare’s history does not begin with its founding as Salisbury in 1890. That moment, often treated as a “beginning,” was instead a violent interruption in a much longer human story. To understand Harare fully, one must move backward and forward in time, tracing how a landscape became a city and how that city continues to negotiate its past.
Before Harare: The Land and Its First Meanings
Long before Harare had a name recognizable on modern maps, the land it occupies was home to Shona-speaking communities. Archaeological evidence suggests human settlement in the region for thousands of years, with Iron Age cultures establishing agricultural societies based on sorghum, millet, and later maize.
The area that would become Harare lay within the sphere of influence of powerful Shona polities, including the Mutapa (Mwene Mutapa) state from the 15th century onward. These societies were not static or primitive, as colonial narratives later implied. They were dynamic, trade-oriented, and deeply embedded in regional and Indian Ocean networks.
Gold was mined and traded long before Europeans arrived, moving through Swahili and Arab merchants to ports such as Sofala. The land was known, valued, and named. Rivers carried spiritual significance. Hills were sites of ancestral presence. Chiefs governed through systems of kinship, land stewardship, and ritual authority.
One of the most important names associated with the area is Harare, derived from Chief Neharawa, whose people lived near what is now the Kopje area. The name would later be distorted, suppressed, and finally restored—but never in quite the same form.
The Colonial Invasion: The Birth of Salisbury (1890)
In September 1890, the Pioneer Column of the British South Africa Company (BSAC), under the authority of Cecil John Rhodes, raised the Union Jack on a rocky hill overlooking a marshy plain. They named the settlement Salisbury, after the British Prime Minister Lord Salisbury.
This act was not a neutral founding but a declaration of possession. The BSAC claimed land through fraudulent treaties and outright coercion, ignoring existing African land tenure systems. The city was designed as a colonial outpost—strategic, segregated, and symbolic.
Salisbury was laid out with European settlers in mind. Wide streets, administrative buildings, and residential zones were planned to reflect British ideals of order and civility. African presence was treated as temporary and functional: laborers, servants, and porters, not citizens.
From the beginning, segregation was spatial. Africans were pushed to the margins, both physically and legally. The city was never meant to be African in its imagination, despite being built on African land.
Early Growth and the Logic of Segregation
The early 20th century saw Salisbury grow slowly but steadily. Railways connected it to Bulawayo and the ports of Mozambique and South Africa. Government offices, churches, and commercial centers emerged.
But growth came with exclusion. Laws such as the Land Apportionment Act of 1930 formalized racial divisions, reserving the best land for whites and confining Africans to overcrowded reserves and townships.
African workers were housed in compounds and locations like Harari Township (later renamed Mbare). These areas were deliberately underdeveloped—seen as temporary spaces for a workforce that colonial planners assumed would eventually “return” to rural areas.
This assumption was wrong. Urban African communities put down roots. They built families, churches, political organizations, and cultures of resistance.
Urban African Life and Early Resistance
Despite harsh controls, African urban life in Salisbury flourished in its own ways. Beer halls, music, sport, and churches became sites of community. Mbare emerged as a center of African urban culture, producing musicians, footballers, and political thinkers.
At the same time, resentment toward colonial rule grew. Africans were taxed without representation, restricted in movement, and denied meaningful political participation.
By the 1940s and 1950s, Salisbury was becoming a political crucible. Trade unions formed. Nationalist ideas circulated. Figures who would later shape Zimbabwe’s future passed through the city’s townships, meetings, and jails.
The Federation Years and Urban Expansion (1953–1963)
The creation of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland brought investment and rapid urban growth. Salisbury expanded physically and economically, becoming a regional administrative hub.
Modern infrastructure—roads, hospitals, universities—was developed, but almost exclusively for whites. Suburbs like Avondale, Mount Pleasant, and Borrowdale symbolized prosperity and privilege.
African townships, by contrast, remained overcrowded and under-resourced. Urban planning was explicitly racial. The city was designed to separate lives, not integrate them.
This period also intensified African political consciousness. The contrast between white affluence and African deprivation was impossible to ignore.
Unilateral Declaration of Independence and the City at War (1965–1979)
In 1965, the white minority government under Ian Smith declared Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) from Britain to avoid transitioning to majority rule.
Salisbury became the capital of an internationally isolated state. Sanctions strained the economy, but the city continued to function through internal production and regional trade.
At the same time, the liberation war intensified. While much of the fighting occurred in rural areas, Salisbury was deeply affected. Surveillance increased. Detentions were common. Townships were monitored as potential centers of subversion.
African political organizations were banned, leaders imprisoned or exiled. Yet resistance persisted—in whispered conversations, clandestine meetings, and cultural expression.
Independence and the Birth of Harare (1980–1982)
Zimbabwe achieved independence in April 1980. Salisbury was renamed Harare in 1982, reclaiming an African name and symbolically rejecting colonial dominance.
The renaming was not just cosmetic. It represented a profound shift in ownership, identity, and aspiration. Streets, buildings, and institutions were renamed to reflect African heroes and values.
Harare became a city of hope. Schools expanded. Healthcare improved. Black Zimbabweans entered spaces previously closed to them.
The early independence years were marked by optimism. Harare was clean, orderly, and relatively prosperous. It was often called one of the most beautiful cities in Africa.
Contradictions of the Postcolonial City
Yet independence did not erase inequality. Colonial spatial patterns remained largely intact. Former white suburbs retained advantages in infrastructure and services.
Rural-to-urban migration accelerated, straining housing and employment. Informal settlements grew. The city’s population exploded faster than planning could accommodate.
Politically, Harare became both the seat of power and a site of dissent. Trade unions, student movements, and civil society organizations found a voice in the city.
Economic Crisis and Urban Struggle (1990s–2000s)
From the 1990s onward, Zimbabwe entered a period of economic decline. Structural adjustment programs reduced public spending. Unemployment rose. Inflation worsened.
Harare bore the brunt. Industries closed. Infrastructure deteriorated. Informal trading became essential for survival.
In 2005, Operation Murambatsvina (“Drive Out the Rubbish”) demolished informal housing and markets, displacing hundreds of thousands of urban residents. Harare’s poorest were hit hardest.
The operation revealed deep tensions between state power and urban life. The city became a battleground over who belonged and who had the right to space.
Harare in the 21st Century: Resilience and Reinvention
Today, Harare is a city of contradictions. It struggles with economic instability, infrastructure challenges, and political uncertainty. Yet it remains vibrant, creative, and resilient.
Street vendors animate sidewalks. Music, art, and literature continue to emerge. Young people reimagine the city through digital culture and entrepreneurship.
Harare’s history is not finished. It continues to be written daily—in buses, markets, protests, weddings, and funerals.
Conclusion: A City That Refuses to Be Reduced
Harare is not just a former colonial capital or a symbol of postcolonial struggle. It is a living archive of African urban experience.
Its history teaches that cities are not neutral spaces. They are shaped by power, but also by resistance. By erasure, and by memory. Harare’s name itself reminds us that history can be suppressed—but not destroyed.
To understand Harare is to understand Zimbabwe’s past, present, and unresolved future. It is a city built on stolen land, reclaimed identity, and ongoing struggle—a city that continues to insist on its right to exist, to change, and to remember.
The Knowledge Base 
Leave a comment