Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat films represent one of the most provocative, controversial, and influential entries in modern comedy. Combining improvisational genius, biting social satire, and a fearless exploration of taboo subjects, the Borat movies occupy a unique space in the cinematic landscape. To understand their significance fully, one must examine not only the films themselves but also the cultural context in which they emerged, the methods used by Cohen, and the broader implications of his work on comedy, politics, and social commentary.
Origins of Borat
Borat Sagdiyev, the titular character of the series, is a fictional Kazakh journalist whose persona is rooted in extreme naivety, ignorance, and a bluntly offensive worldview. Borat first appeared as a minor character on Da Ali G Show, a satirical British television series created and performed by Sacha Baron Cohen. On the show, Borat’s absurd and offensive behavior was contrasted against real people, exposing biases, prejudices, and societal absurdities.
Borat’s character is deliberately exaggerated. He embodies outdated stereotypes about Eastern Europe and Central Asia, but the genius of Cohen’s satire is that Borat’s ridiculousness acts as a mirror: the truly revealing moments come from the people Borat interacts with, not Borat himself. In essence, Borat is a lens for observing the world, and the more he pushes boundaries, the more he exposes cultural truths.
The First Film: Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan (2006)
Released in 2006, the first Borat film introduced the character to a global audience. The title itself, deliberately verbose and awkwardly phrased, signals the film’s ironic humor and sets the tone for the cultural collisions that follow. The premise is deceptively simple: Borat travels from Kazakhstan to the United States to learn about American culture and ultimately deliver a gift to the nation—specifically to Pamela Anderson, his obsession, reflecting his naive, hyperbolic understanding of America.
Structure and Style
Unlike traditional narrative films, Borat blurs the line between fiction and reality. Much of the movie is unscripted, relying on real interactions with unsuspecting Americans. Cohen and his crew employed hidden cameras, improvisation, and elaborate setups to capture genuine reactions. This approach creates an unsettling realism: the audience never quite knows how much is staged and how much is authentic.
Cinematically, the film combines documentary-style techniques with comedic narrative. Travelogue sequences, montage edits, and faux interviews are interspersed with scripted scenes involving professional actors. This hybrid form allows the film to oscillate between surreal comedy and social critique seamlessly.
Humor and Satire
At its core, Borat is a study in contrast. Borat’s offensive behavior exposes the prejudices, ignorance, and hypocrisy of the people he encounters. For example, scenes in which Borat makes anti-Semitic or sexist remarks often elicit equally revealing responses from the unsuspecting public. Cohen’s humor is intentionally uncomfortable; the laughter comes not from Borat’s antics alone, but from the awkward confrontation with real human biases.
The film also satirizes the absurdities of cultural imperialism and ethnocentrism. Borat’s perspective—proudly defending the supposed glory of Kazakhstan—forces American audiences to confront their own cultural assumptions. By exaggerating stereotypes, the movie invites reflection on how prejudice functions in everyday life.
Reception and Controversy
Upon its release, Borat was both celebrated and vilified. Critics praised its audacious satire, with some calling it the most daring comedy of the decade. Yet the film faced backlash from various quarters: the government of Kazakhstan expressed outrage at its portrayal of the country, and numerous participants later sued for defamation or emotional distress. These controversies only amplified the film’s cultural impact, cementing Borat as a lightning rod for discussion about taste, boundaries, and the ethics of comedy.
Financially, the film was a massive success. Made on a modest budget, it grossed over $260 million worldwide, demonstrating that audiences were willing to embrace daring, unconventional comedy. More importantly, the success validated Cohen’s approach: risk, irreverence, and social critique could coexist in mainstream entertainment.
Cultural Impact
The first Borat film left a lasting mark on pop culture. Borat’s phrases, such as “Very nice!” and “High five!”, became part of the cultural lexicon. Yet beyond memes and catchphrases, the film reshaped the possibilities of satire. It demonstrated that comedy could be more than jokes—it could serve as a tool for social examination. The movie’s influence is evident in the rise of other prank-based or documentary-style comedy projects that seek to reveal societal truths through confrontation and improvisation.
The Sequel: Borat Subsequent Moviefilm: Delivery of Prodigious Bribe to American Regime for Make Benefit Once Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan (2020)
Fourteen years after the original, Cohen returned to Borat with a sequel that was both timely and ambitious. Released during a turbulent political climate in the United States, the film used Borat’s lens to comment on contemporary issues, including politics, media, and social polarization.
Updated Context and Premise
In this installment, Borat is sent back to America to deliver a “gift” to the then-current U.S. administration. Unlike the first film, the sequel reflects a more cynical and politically aware Borat, navigating a society that has grown more divided and extreme. The narrative includes Borat’s daughter, Tutar (played by Maria Bakalova), adding a generational and feminist dimension to the story.
The inclusion of Tutar serves multiple purposes. Comedically, she amplifies Borat’s absurdity through contrast—her intelligence and assertiveness highlight his ignorance. Politically, her storyline critiques the patriarchy, gender norms, and the objectification of women. Tutar evolves from a plot device into a fully realized character, making the sequel more narratively sophisticated than the original.
The Sequel’s Humor and Social Critique
While the first film focused on cultural exposure, the second film leans heavily into political satire. Borat’s interactions with politicians, media figures, and conservative Americans reveal contemporary tensions around misinformation, partisanship, and extremism. Cohen’s approach remains audacious: he places his characters in real situations that force genuine reactions, blurring the line between performance and reality.
Notably, the sequel leverages shock humor to tackle systemic issues. Scenes involving sexual harassment, xenophobia, and political opportunism are deliberately uncomfortable. The audience laughs, yes—but the laughter is accompanied by reflection, guilt, and moral questioning. Cohen has described this duality as central to his philosophy: the comedy is only effective if it challenges viewers, not just entertains them.
Critical and Cultural Reception
The sequel was a critical success, with particular praise for Maria Bakalova’s performance. Cohen himself was lauded for maintaining his daring approach while adapting to a new cultural landscape. The film also sparked debates about ethics in comedy, as participants were again unwittingly drawn into potentially compromising situations.
Interestingly, the sequel found a new layer of resonance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 U.S. election cycle. Its commentary on misinformation, media spectacle, and societal division felt prescient, cementing Borat as a mirror to the anxieties of contemporary America.
Techniques Behind the Chaos
One of the most fascinating aspects of the Borat films is their production methodology. Unlike traditional comedies, these films rely heavily on improvisation and real-world interaction. Cohen’s process involves meticulous preparation: actors and crews must anticipate potential reactions, understand legal boundaries, and ensure hidden cameras capture everything while remaining unobtrusive.
The success of these methods depends on Cohen’s commitment to character. He stays in persona under extreme circumstances, often risking physical safety and social backlash. The result is a form of comedy that is simultaneously spontaneous, daring, and intensely controlled—a paradox that few other filmmakers attempt.
Ethical Considerations
The Borat films raise profound ethical questions. Participants in the films are often unaware they are part of a comedy sketch, leading to concerns about consent, deception, and emotional harm. Critics argue that exploiting real people for satire can be morally dubious, even if it reveals societal truths. Supporters counter that the films’ targets—those who express bigotry or hypocrisy—are complicit, and that the public good of exposing prejudice outweighs potential discomfort.
This tension between ethics and art is central to the Borat phenomenon. Cohen himself has defended his approach as a form of social experiment, insisting that the film’s value lies in its ability to provoke introspection and public dialogue.
Legacy and Influence
The influence of the Borat films extends beyond comedy. They have shaped conversations about satire, ethics, and media literacy. By blurring the line between reality and performance, Cohen challenges audiences to question what they see, what they believe, and how they behave. The films also demonstrate the power of humor as a vehicle for critique—when done thoughtfully, laughter can provoke reflection and change.
Culturally, Borat has become an icon of boundary-pushing satire. References to Borat appear in political commentary, social media discourse, and even academic discussions about media ethics. Few characters in comedy have had such a lasting and multifaceted impact, bridging the gap between entertainment, critique, and cultural reflection.
Conclusion
The Borat movies are far more than crude comedies – they are ambitious social experiments disguised as films. Through the lens of Borat Sagdiyev, Sacha Baron Cohen exposes prejudice, hypocrisy, and absurdity in ways that are simultaneously hilarious, uncomfortable, and intellectually provocative. From the original 2006 film’s cultural shock to the 2020 sequel’s incisive political satire, Borat has evolved with the times while maintaining the audacious spirit that made him famous.
The Knowledge Base 
Leave a comment