I. Origins: A Childhood in the Shadow of History
Sheikh Hasina was born on 28 September 1947 in Tungipara, East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), into one of the most influential political families in South Asia. Her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, is revered as the “Father of the Nation” in Bangladesh for his role in leading the struggle for independence from Pakistan in 1971. Hasina’s early years were therefore shaped by the crucible of nationalist movements, colonial legacies, and the tumultuous birth of her homeland.
At the age of 26, in 1975, Hasina survived a cataclysmic moment that would define her life: a military coup claimed the lives of most of her family, including her father and nearly all her immediate relatives. As a young mother and student, she was abroad at the time—an act of providence that spared her life but also cast her into decades of political struggle and personal trauma.
Her father’s assassination, alongside the disappearance of political order, pushed Hasina into the crucible of Bangladeshi opposition politics. She went into exile in India but returned in 1981 to assume leadership of the Awami League, the party her father had led and which espoused secularism, democracy, and Bengali nationalism.
II. Political Ascent: From Opposition to Leadership
Hasina’s political ascent was slow but steady. The 1980s and 1990s in Bangladesh were marked by alternating periods of military rule and fragile democracy. Multiple coups, contested elections, and intense rivalry between major political parties—the Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)—shaped this volatile era.
In 1996, Hasina achieved a breakthrough: she became prime minister for the first time following an election victory. However, her first term (1996–2001) was short‑lived and hampered by political gridlock and factionalism. For most of the decade that followed, she remained the leader of the opposition, while the rival BNP, led by Khaleda Zia, governed. During this period, her political battles helped institutionalize Bangladesh’s duopoly politics—two charismatic female leaders contending for dominance.
Hasina returned to power in 2009 and then consolidated an unprecedented era of political control. She won four consecutive terms as prime minister—a record in Bangladesh’s history—ruling from 2009 to 2024. In January 2024, she was sworn in for a fifth term shortly after her Awami League’s overwhelming parliamentary victory. This victory was described by critics as resulting from a controversial election in which the main opposition boycotted the polls and voter turnout was low amid allegations of suppression.
Hence began a period that came to define Hasina’s legacy: substantial economic development on one hand, and creeping authoritarianism on the other.
III. Development and Governance: Achievements and Authoritarianism
During her long tenure in office, Sheikh Hasina’s governments pursued ambitious development agendas. Bangladesh experienced noteworthy improvements in infrastructure, digital connectivity, garment exports, and poverty reduction. Substantial progress was made in energy production, roads, ports, and telecommunications. Her leadership was credited with stabilizing Bangladesh’s economic growth and transforming its image globally from one of perennial crisis to dynamic potential.
Her supporters touted these achievements as proof of her farsighted governance and commitment to national development. Policies on education, women’s empowerment, and health reforms helped reshape social indicators, and Bangladesh became one of the world’s fastest‑growing economies during her later years in office.
However, beneath these surface successes lay growing concerns about political freedoms, democratic backsliding, and institutional erosion. Over her terms, Hasina presided over a government increasingly criticized for suppressing opposition voices, marginalizing critical media, and detaining political rivals. Opposition parties alleged politicized legal actions and constraints on civic freedoms.
Indeed, an Al Jazeera profile described her shift as a transformation from “Bangladesh’s democracy icon” to an increasingly “authoritarian” prime minister, noting the government’s crackdowns and unilateral political maneuvers.
This duality—economic progress alongside democratic retreat—became a hallmark of her tenure.
IV. The Crisis of 2024: Uprising and Downfall
The defining rupture in Sheikh Hasina’s career came in 2024. A seemingly technical dispute over civil service job allocation turned into widespread student protests that escalated into a nationwide uprising between July and August 2024. Millions of Bangladeshis took to the streets demanding political reform, accountability, and an end to long‑standing patterns of governance. The protests—predominantly led by youth and students but joined by diverse sections of society—reflected deep frustrations with perceived corruption, stagnation, and authoritarian practices.
The government’s response was stark. Security forces deployed lethal measures against protesters, including the use of helicopters, drones, and live ammunition. According to United Nations estimates, as many as 1,400 people were killed during this unrest, which has been widely characterized as one of the most violent in Bangladesh’s history.
The uprising reached a tipping point in August 2024, forcing Sheikh Hasina to resign and flee Bangladesh. Her departure marked the end of a fifteen‑year rule and the beginning of profound political upheaval. A caretaker government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus was installed, tasked with stabilizing the country and overseeing reforms.
Protesters celebrated Hasina’s exit with symbolic acts, including the demolition of her father’s statue—a national icon—and other symbols associated with her regime.
In the aftermath, the interim government banned all activities of the Awami League in May 2025, citing its role in the violent crackdowns. Hasina’s passports and those of 96 associates were also revoked by the interim authorities as part of legal actions against her political network.
V. Legal Battles and International Controversy
After her resignation and flight to India, Sheikh Hasina faced a succession of legal challenges and charges in Bangladesh. In June 2025, she was formally charged by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) with crimes against humanity for her role in the 2024 unrest. Prosecutors alleged she orchestrated and commanded a brutal crackdown on dissent, resulting in massive casualties.
In November 2025, the tribunal convicted Hasina in absentia and sentenced her to death for crimes against humanity—a verdict that shocked the region and drew international scrutiny. The charges cited her alleged direction of lethal force and failure to restrain violent state action.
Supporters of the tribunal asserted that justice was being served and that accountability for the violent suppression was overdue. Critics, including international observers and human rights advocates, described the process as politically motivated. Allegations emerged that the tribunal’s procedures were compromised and that the trials reflected political vengeance rather than impartial justice.
Bangladesh’s interim government pursued Hasina’s extradition from India, where she remained in protective refuge. Dhaka issued formal diplomatic requests, prompting tense discussions in regional capitals. However, extradition became a complex legal and diplomatic challenge because of treaty limitations and India’s cautious stance toward external legal entanglements.
Adding to her legal woes, Hasina was also sentenced to 21 years in prison by a Bangladeshi court on corruption charges tied to abuses in a state housing program during her tenure.
These legal battles have not only transformed her personal fate but also reshaped Bangladesh’s politics. Hasina’s conviction and sentencing remain subjects of intense debate, emblematic of deeper fissures within Bangladeshi society about justice, retribution, and political competition.
VI. The Transitional Phase and 2026 Elections
As Bangladesh navigated the political fallout of Hasina’s ouster, the focus shifted toward transitional governance and elections. After stabilizing immediate crises and banning the Awami League—which had dominated politics under Hasina—the country prepared for national elections in February 2026. These elections marked the first major political contest since the tumultuous events of 2024–2025.
The election unveiling was historic in multiple dimensions. It saw the return of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by Tarique Rahman—the son of former prime minister Khaleda Zia—from a 17‑year exile. Rahman’s party won a decisive majority in parliament in what many observers called the most open and competitive election in decades.
The BNP’s victory was widely interpreted as a repudiation of the years of polarized rule under Hasina’s Awami League. Rahman promised democratic renewal, economic revival, and stronger institutional checks and balances. The elections also showcased the electorate’s desire for change after prolonged social unrest and political repression.
Alongside the parliamentary elections, a constitutional referendum was held in February 2026, approving significant reforms—such as limiting prime ministerial terms and strengthening judicial independence—signifying a broader commitment to structural governance changes.
Yet even this transition was not without controversy. Critics contended that suspending the Awami League from political activity limited choice and risked creating new forms of exclusion. The presence of Islamist parties in parliament, some with radical reputations, also raised concerns domestically and internationally about Bangladesh’s ideological direction.
Nonetheless, these developments cemented a dramatic shift from Hasina’s long leadership to a new political chapter—one that continues to unfold in 2026.
VII. Legacy: A Multifaceted and Contested Figure
Assessing Sheikh Hasina’s legacy is inherently complex. Her name evokes admiration from supporters, condemnation from opponents, and deep reflection among observers of South Asian politics. Her life spans independence movements, dynastic tragedy, political longevity, economic transformation, authoritarian tendencies, violent upheaval, and legal reckoning. Each of these spheres underscores distinct aspects of her leadership and its consequences.
Economic and Developmental Impact
Under Hasina’s reign, Bangladesh achieved significant developmental strides – rapid GDP growth, elevated infrastructure projects, and social programs that lifted millions out of poverty. Her leadership helped reposition Bangladesh in the global economic landscape and attracted foreign investment. For many citizens, these material improvements are a testament to her effectiveness as a leader.
Authoritarian Critiques
Simultaneously, her administration faced persistent criticisms of democratic erosion. Opposition suppression, curtailment of civil liberties, electoral controversies, and partisan legal actions have led scholars and human rights organizations to label parts of her tenure as authoritarian. These critiques underscore the tension between effective governance and democratic accountability – a theme central to contemporary governance debates beyond Bangladesh’s borders.
Polarization and Political Rivalry
Hasina’s prolonged rivalry with the BNP, especially with Khaleda Zia and later her son Tarique Rahman, shaped the political polarization of Bangladesh for decades. These dueling legacies – sealed further by Zia’s death in December 2025 – transform Bangladesh’s political narratives from individual leaders to generational and ideological disputes.
Social and Cultural Resonance
Culturally, Hasina’s identity as the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman carries symbolic weight. Her leadership anchored the mythology of liberation and national identity, even as reinterpretations of that legacy became battlegrounds in post‑2024 political contestation.
The Knowledge Base 
Leave a comment