Introduction
In the middle of the Indian Ocean lies an island that rarely appears in travel literature, is absent from most world maps used in classrooms, and yet plays an outsized role in global military strategy. Diego Garcia is a place defined by contradiction: geographically isolated yet geopolitically central; physically pristine yet historically scarred; legally contested yet operationally decisive. To understand Diego Garcia is to explore not only coral reefs and runways, but also colonial legacies, forced displacement, Cold War anxieties, and the enduring tension between strategic power and human rights.
Part of the Chagos Archipelago, Diego Garcia is the largest and southernmost atoll in the chain. It is administered by the United Kingdom as part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, while hosting one of the most important overseas military facilities of the United States Navy. Beneath this arrangement lies a long and unresolved dispute involving Mauritius, international law, and the displaced Chagossian people.
The Physical Geography of Diego Garcia
Diego Garcia is a classic coral atoll: a ring-shaped island enclosing a shallow lagoon, formed over millions of years as volcanic activity subsided and coral growth continued upward. The atoll stretches roughly 60 kilometers in circumference, with a narrow landmass that rarely rises more than a few meters above sea level. From above, it resembles a horseshoe or broken ring, its lagoon shimmering in shades of turquoise and deep blue.
The climate is tropical maritime, characterized by high humidity, stable temperatures, and seasonal monsoon winds. Cyclones are relatively rare compared to other parts of the Indian Ocean, a factor that has contributed significantly to the island’s strategic appeal. The surrounding waters are rich in marine biodiversity, and the land supports coconut palms, hardwood trees, and migratory bird populations.
From an environmental perspective, Diego Garcia appears almost untouched. There is no urban sprawl, no commercial agriculture, and no tourism infrastructure. Yet this apparent purity is deceptive. The island’s landscape has been heavily modified to support military operations: reefs dredged to deepen channels, land reclaimed to extend runways, and native vegetation cleared to make way for facilities. The environment has not been spared transformation; it has simply been reshaped to serve a different purpose.
Early Human Presence and Colonial Incorporation
Unlike many islands in the Indian Ocean, Diego Garcia had no indigenous population prior to European contact. Human settlement began in the late eighteenth century, when the French established coconut plantations worked by enslaved Africans and later by indentured laborers from Africa and South Asia. These workers, and their descendants, came to form a distinct community known today as the Chagossians or Ilois.
Following the Napoleonic Wars, France ceded the Chagos Archipelago to Britain, and the islands were administered as a dependency of colonial Mauritius. Life on Diego Garcia during this period was harsh but stable. Plantation labor was demanding, but the island community developed its own Creole language, cultural practices, and strong sense of belonging to the land.
This sense of rootedness would later stand in stark contrast to the way the island was redefined—not as a home, but as a strategic asset.
Cold War Logic and Strategic Transformation
The modern history of Diego Garcia cannot be understood without reference to the Cold War. In the 1960s, as the British Empire retreated and the United States sought to secure global lines of influence, the Indian Ocean emerged as a region of growing strategic concern. The rise of newly independent states, the spread of Soviet naval power, and the importance of Middle Eastern oil supplies all contributed to this shift.
Against this backdrop, Diego Garcia’s location proved ideal. It sits roughly equidistant between Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. Its isolation reduced the risk of local political interference, while its lagoon could accommodate large naval vessels and submarines. In strategic terms, it was a blank slate.
To facilitate its use as a military base, the United Kingdom separated the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, creating the British Indian Ocean Territory. This act occurred shortly before Mauritian independence and remains one of the most controversial decisions in British colonial history.
The Forced Displacement of the Chagossians
Perhaps the most troubling chapter in Diego Garcia’s story is the forced removal of its civilian population. Between the late 1960s and early 1970s, the entire Chagossian community—numbering around 1,500 to 2,000 people—was expelled from Diego Garcia and other islands in the archipelago.
The displacement was carried out gradually and, at times, deceptively. Some islanders were prevented from returning after traveling abroad; others were told they were being relocated temporarily. By 1973, Diego Garcia had been completely depopulated of its civilian inhabitants.
The Chagossians were resettled primarily in Mauritius and the Seychelles, where many faced poverty, unemployment, and social marginalization. Compensation was limited and slow, and for decades their legal challenges were met with resistance from the British government.
The ethical implications of this removal are profound. The island was not taken from an empty space, but from a living community with deep social and cultural ties. Diego Garcia’s transformation into a military stronghold was made possible only by erasing its human presence.
The Military Base and Its Global Role
Today, Diego Garcia hosts one of the most significant overseas military installations operated by the United States. The base includes a long-range airfield capable of handling heavy bombers, extensive fuel storage facilities, satellite communication systems, and a deep-water port.
From Diego Garcia, military operations have been conducted across the Middle East and South Asia, including during conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Its distance from potential adversaries, combined with its logistical capacity, makes it an ideal platform for power projection.
Unlike bases located in allied countries, Diego Garcia is largely insulated from domestic political pressures. There are no local protests, no national elections, and no civilian population to negotiate with. This political quietude is, in part, a direct consequence of the island’s depopulation.
While the base is often described in technical terms—runways, tankers, logistics—it also symbolizes a particular model of global security: one in which strategic necessity overrides local rights, and where remoteness becomes a virtue rather than a limitation.
Legal Disputes and International Law
The status of Diego Garcia has been challenged repeatedly in international legal forums. Mauritius argues that the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago was unlawful and that the islands should have been returned upon independence. The Chagossians, meanwhile, seek the right to return to their homeland.
Advisory opinions and resolutions from international bodies have increasingly favored the Mauritian position, emphasizing the right to self-determination and the illegitimacy of colonial-era territorial manipulation. However, such opinions are not always binding, and enforcement remains elusive.
The United Kingdom maintains administrative control, citing security agreements and strategic obligations. The United States, while not a colonial administrator, is deeply invested in maintaining access to the base.
Diego Garcia thus exists in a legal gray zone: acknowledged by many as unjustly administered, yet practically unchanged due to geopolitical realities.
Environmental Protection and Contradictions
In recent years, Diego Garcia has been designated as part of a large marine protected area. On the surface, this appears to be a positive step for environmental conservation. The surrounding waters are among the most pristine in the Indian Ocean, and restrictions on fishing and development help preserve delicate ecosystems.
Yet critics argue that environmental protection has been selectively applied. While civilian resettlement is deemed incompatible with conservation, large-scale military activity—including dredging, fuel storage, and aircraft operations – continues unabated. Conservation, in this context, becomes another layer in the justification for exclusion.
This raises uncomfortable questions: whose presence is considered harmful, and whose is deemed acceptable? Environmental discourse, like strategic discourse, can be shaped to serve existing power structures.
Diego Garcia in the Contemporary World
As global power dynamics shift once again, Diego Garcia remains relevant. The rise of China, renewed competition in the Indo-Pacific, and the persistence of instability in the Middle East all reinforce the island’s strategic value.
At the same time, the moral and legal questions surrounding its status have not disappeared. The Chagossian community continues to campaign for recognition, restitution, and the right to return. Their struggle has gained greater visibility, but tangible outcomes remain limited.
Diego Garcia thus stands at the intersection of past and future. It is a relic of Cold War planning that continues to shape twenty-first-century geopolitics, and a symbol of colonial injustice that challenges modern claims of a rules-based international order.
The Knowledge Base 
Leave a comment