Ruby Franke: From Family Influencer to Convicted Felon
In the early 2010s, Ruby Franke rose from relative obscurity to become one of the most recognizable faces in the sprawling world of family‑centric social media. With her now‑defunct YouTube channel 8 Passengers, she built an online identity as a devoted mother and parenting guru. Millions tuned in to watch her “momfluencer” content – parenting tips, daily family life, discipline philosophies, and the genuine‑looking interactions of a carefully curated nuclear family. But behind the polished camera frames was a story that, with time, would unravel into a harrowing cautionary tale about internet fame, abuse, and the exploitation of children online.
The Rise of a Family Vlog Star
Ruby Franke’s journey into public life began in 2015. Born Ruby Griffiths on January 18, 1982, in Logan, Utah, she became a stay‑at‑home mother to six children with her then‑husband, Kevin Franke. Together, they launched 8 Passengers, a YouTube vlog showcasing the realities of raising a large family. The channel, at its height, amassed over 2.5 million subscribers and generated huge engagement, offering views into mundane parenting moments, discipline strategies, and the everyday grind of family life.
Franke’s appeal stemmed partly from her clarity of mission: she positioned herself as a real-world parent unafraid to share challenges and tough love discipline techniques. Viewers who subscribed and followed faithfully often saw this as refreshingly transparent, a contrast to highly exaggerated reality TV portrayals. Yet as early as 2020, some viewers began to express concern. Older videos revealed questionable practices – such as a son sleeping on a beanbag for months as punishment – sparking complaints and intense scrutiny from audiences who saw red flags beneath the surface of curated content.
The Shift: Collaboration with Jodi Hildebrandt
In the years leading up to her arrest, Franke’s content and parenting philosophy changed noticeably. She began working more closely with Jodi Hildebrandt, a life coach and counselor whose own digital presence cast her as an expert in psychological and spiritual approaches to family life. The two formed a professional partnership that blurred the lines between mentorship and influence.
Under Hildebrandt’s guidance and through their joint online content — including parenting courses and Instagram narratives — Franke’s disciplinary methods became increasingly strict. They emphasized obedience, obedience‑based reward systems, harsh punishment, and a moral framework that linked children’s behavior to spiritual evil or possession. The partnership grew to the point where Franke entrusted Hildebrandt with primary care of her two youngest children, a decision that would have catastrophic consequences.
The Breaking Point: 2023 Arrest and Charges
The turning point in this saga came on August 30, 2023, when Franke’s 12‑year‑old son escaped from Hildebrandt’s home in Ivins, Utah, seeking help from a neighbor. The child was visibly malnourished, duct‑taped at the wrists and ankles, suffering with open wounds and desperate for food and water. This event triggered a police response that revealed a broader pattern of abuse affecting his younger sister, who was found in a similarly neglected condition.
The discovery shocked neighbors, online followers, and the general public. Police took swift action, removing the two youngest children into protective custody. They then arrested both Franke and Hildebrandt, charging them each with six counts of aggravated child abuse — felonies that quickly transformed the social media personality from an online celebrity to a criminal defendant.
Plea, Conviction, and Sentencing
In December of 2023, Franke pleaded guilty to four counts of aggravated child abuse. The charges stemmed from explicit and documented acts of neglect and physical harm outlined in police reports and court filings. These included starvation, physical restraint, exposure to extreme heat without protection, denial of basic needs, and psychological manipulation of the children.
On February 20, 2024, a Washington County court sentenced Franke and Hildebrandt to four consecutive prison terms, each ranging from one to 15 years. Due to a Utah state law limiting maximum cumulative sentences, they face up to 30 years in prison — though the Utah Board of Pardons and Parole will ultimately determine how much time they will serve.
Life Behind Bars and Where Things Stand in 2026
As of early 2026, Ruby Franke remains incarcerated at the Utah State Correctional Facility. According to recent reporting, she continues to serve her sentence — and the broader public remains fascinated, horrified, and divided over what her case reveals about online influencers and parental responsibility. Details about her daily life in prison, her relationships with her children, and her behavior while incarcerated are limited, but they continue to attract attention in true-crime coverage and documentaries.
The popularity of documentary and true-crime storytelling has further amplified the case. Netflix’s Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story, released in December 2025, highlights the complex dynamic between Franke and Hildebrandt and underscores how both women contributed to the abuse and how external influences warped Franke’s worldview.
Moreover, just days ago, Ruby’s son — now older and separated from his family — released journal entries detailing alleged manipulation and “brainwashing” that occurred during their upbringing, adding raw primary perspective to the historical narrative and pushing the story further into the public consciousness.
The Impact on Family, Society, and Law
The Franke case has not only reshaped how the world views her and similar influencers – it has also affected public policy.
1. Utah’s Legal Reforms
In response to this case, Utah lawmakers enacted new protections for children featured in influencer content. Signed into law in 2025, the legislation requires parents who earn significant income (over $150,000 annually) from content involving their children to establish trust funds safeguarding a portion of those earnings for the minors’ future. It also provides procedures for children to request content removal when they reach adulthood, addressing a growing gap in digital consent laws.
The law’s advocates include Franke’s ex‑husband, who acknowledged regretting having featured their children online and now supports stringent safeguards so other families won’t experience similar trauma.
2. Broader Cultural Debate
Beyond legal changes, Franke’s case ignited intense cultural debate about “family vlogging” and ethical influencer practices. Critics argue that children depicted in family vlogs often have little agency over their digital presence, which can expose them to exploitation, privacy violations, and emotional harm. Some former fans have publicly criticized the culture of monetizing children’s lives for online fame, calling for stricter industry standards or even bans on certain forms of family-focused content.
Meanwhile, Franke’s eldest son, Shari, has emerged as an outspoken voice against family vlogging, sharing his own experiences and advocating for broader awareness of the emotional cost such exposure can impose on children.
What Ruby Franke’s Story Teaches Us
Ruby Franke’s story, in many ways, serves as a stark parable for the digital age. It illustrates how online fame can obscure deeper personal dysfunction and how social media incentives – likes, comments, views – can distort priorities and ethical standards. The situation also highlights the immense responsibility that comes with sharing real lives, especially those of children, with a vast global audience.
It raises difficult questions:
- How should society regulate content that involves minors?
- What safeguards should protect children from manipulation by adults seeking profit?
- How can fans and followers better discern between wholesome content and exploitation masked as family entertainment?
The Knowledge Base 
Leave a comment